Advertisement

DA urges judge in Trump hush money case to deny ‘frivolous’ recusal motion

DA urges judge in Trump hush money case to deny ‘frivolous’ recusal motion

Trump's Recusal Bid Rejected: Prosecutors Slam 'Vexatious and Frivolous' Attempt

In a court filing made public on Friday, prosecutors from the Manhattan District Attorney's office have firmly rejected former President Donald Trump's third attempt to have the judge overseeing his New York criminal hush money case recused. The prosecutors argued that Trump failed to identify any new facts or circumstances that would justify his latest recusal motion, describing it as a "vexatious and frivolous attempt to relitigate" an issue that the court had already decided twice.

Prosecutors Dismiss Trump's Recusal Bid as Baseless

Prosecutors Refute Trump's Recusal Argument

Prosecutors in the Manhattan District Attorney's office have firmly dismissed former President Donald Trump's third attempt to have the judge overseeing his New York criminal hush money case recused. In their court filing, the prosecutors argued that Trump's latest recusal motion is a "vexatious and frivolous attempt to relitigate" an issue that the court had already decided twice.The prosecutors argued that Trump failed to identify any new facts or circumstances that would justify his third recusal attempt. They urged Judge Juan Merchan to deny Trump's motion, stating that "no amount of overheated, hyperbolic rhetoric can cure the fatal defects in defendant's ongoing effort to impugn the fairness of these proceedings and the impartiality of this Court."

Trump's Recusal Bid Lacks Substance

Earlier this week, Trump's defense lawyers asked Judge Merchan to step aside from the case due to an alleged conflict of interest between Vice President Kamala Harris and the judge's daughter. However, prosecutors argued that the vice president was already mentioned in the defense's past recusal motion, which the court had denied in April. They further stated that the defense lawyers have failed to identify any other changes that would support their argument for the judge's recusal.Prosecutors emphasized that the court had already correctly held that the "speculative series of claims" in Trump's previous recusal motion did not remotely establish that Judge Merchan had "a direct, personal, substantial or pecuniary interest in reaching a particular conclusion." They urged the judge to reach the same conclusion in Trump's third attempt to seek his recusal.

Trump's Conviction and Appeal

In May, Trump was found guilty on 34 felony counts of falsifying business records related to a 2016 hush money payment to adult film actress Stormy Daniels. The former president has stated that he will appeal the decision.The prosecutors' firm rejection of Trump's latest recusal attempt underscores the legal challenges he continues to face in the New York criminal case. As the legal battle continues, the outcome of this case could have significant implications for Trump's political future and the broader legal landscape.

Advertisement